Re: A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014/4/10 16:04, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2014/4/10 15:34, xiexiangyou wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup.
>> Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems".
>> It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill
>> the first operation is finished.
>>
>>
>> So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file,
>> It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory
>> of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems"
>> will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex".
>>
>> In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock.
>>
> 
> Yeah, in newer kernels we no longer grab cgroup_mutex in cpuset_write_resmask().
> 

But it will still block, because cpuset_mutex is still a global lock,
not a per cpuset lock.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux