Re: [patch 10/11] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:59:41PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> Now that process handling system oom conditions have access to a small
> amount of memory reserves, we need a way to notify those process on
> system oom conditions.
> 
> When a userspace process waits on the root memcg's memory.oom_control, it
> will wake up anytime there is a system oom condition.
> 
> This is a special case of oom notifiers since it doesn't subsequently
> notify all memcgs under the root memcg (all memcgs on the system).  We
> don't want to trigger those oom handlers which are set aside specifically
> for true memcg oom notifications that disable their own oom killers to
> enforce their own oom policy, for example.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

Until consensus on the whole approach can be reached,

 Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux