Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/02/2014 09:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:11:04 +0800


introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff,
we can use it to backup sk_classid when net_ns switch.

Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry, no new sk_buff members unless there is absolutely not other
possible implementation.

sk_buff is too big as-is.

To get what you want fix the dev_forward_skb() call. But its
not clear to me why you would expect the sock info to be propagated
like this. It seems like an incorrect assumption or a misunderstanding
somewhere. If the virtual link was a physical link you wouldn't expect
to know anything about the senders socket.

Thanks,
John

--
John Fastabend         Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux