On 12/06/2013 08:25 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:13:12AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Second, it's not clear to me why we need the CSS_ONLINE flag at all if >>> we never assign css's that we fail to online to a cgroup. AFAIU we will >>> never see such css's, because in all places we call offline_css(), >>> namely cgroup_destroy_locked() (via kill_css()) and >>> cgroup_unload_subsys(), we use cgroup_css() which will return NULL for them. >> The whole thing is in flux and will look very different in near >> future. I actually had patches queued which deal with the issue you >> spotted but they are being blocked on other changes ATM. So, yeah, >> there are some spurious stuff now. > LOL, I found the patch. It was posted and acked I just forgot to > apply the whole series. I'm a moron. > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/26804 > > This should do it, right? I'll update the patch description and > repost the series. If combined with the patch you've sent recently, this should do the trick. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
