Re: [patch 3.2] memcg OOM robustness (x86 only)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: azurIt <azurit@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 3.2] memcg OOM robustness (x86 only)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 12:30:52 -0400
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130803103852.E9858EB0@pobox.sk>

Hey azur,

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 10:38:52AM +0200, azurIt wrote:
> is this still up to date? Thank you.

no, I'll send an updated version in a bit.

Thanks!
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [patch 0/6] improve memcg oom killer robustness
  - From: Johannes Weiner
- [patch 3.2] memcg OOM robustness (x86 only)
  - From: Johannes Weiner
- Re: [patch 3.2] memcg OOM robustness (x86 only)
  - From: azurIt

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] Add memcg dirty/writeback page accounting
Next by Date: [patch 7/7] mm: memcg: do not trap chargers with full callstack on OOM
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3.2] memcg OOM robustness (x86 only)
Next by thread: [PATCH v5.1] Soft limit rework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux