Re: [OFFLIST] status of devcg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@xxxxxxxxxx):
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > FWIW, libvirt's usage of devcg is to deny all by default, allow major 136
> > (for all /dev/pts/*), followed by allow (major,minor) pair for each specific
> > whitelisted devices. As such we don't have anything that relies on ordering
> > of rules in devcg.
> 
> I'd personally much prefer something very simple - allow all by
> default, allow only the specified if explicitly specified.  I really
> don't want full iptables like facility inside devcg.
> 
> Thanks.

FWIW lxc is also quite happy with the simple rules.

Is there something in particular you want to accomplish for which the
current rules do not suffice?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux