On Fri 14-06-13 22:35:22, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:31:25PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > I'll play with it a bit more on an actual machine and post more > > results. Test program attached. > > So, here are the results from the same test on a dual-socket 2-way > NUMA opteron 8 core machine. > > Running on one CPU. > > copy size atomic percpu diff in pct > 0 535964443 616756827 +15.07% > 32 399988186 378678713 -5.33% > 64 389067476 355073979 -8.74% > 128 342192631 315615300 -7.77% > 256 281208005 260598931 -7.33% > 512 188070912 193225269 +2.74% > > Running on all eight cores. > > copy size atomic percpu diff in pct > 0 121324328 4889425511 +3,930.05% > 32 96170193 2999613380 +3,019.07% > 64 98139061 2813894184 +2,767.25% > 128 112610025 2503229487 +2,122.92% > 256 96828114 2069865752 +2,037.67% > 512 95858297 1537726109 +1,504.17% > > Ration of all cores / single core. > > copy size atomic percpu > 0 0.23 7.93 > 32 0.24 7.92 > 64 0.25 7.92 > 128 0.33 7.93 > 256 0.34 7.94 > 512 0.51 7.96 > > Note exactly 8 - the cores do share quite a bit of resources after all > - but pretty close. > Thanks for your results! Yes the boost can be really high. I will try to measure some memcg workloads as soon as I have some spare cycles. I do not expect a big win but I also do not think this would regress. Thanks. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
