[Fix Glauber's new address]
On Thu 13-06-13 17:53:19, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 13-06-13 17:12:55, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Sorry for updating the patchset so late.
> >
> > I've made some changes for the memory barrier thing, and I agree with
> > Michal that there can be improvement but can be a separate patch.
> >
> > If this version is ok for everyone, I'll send the whole patchset out
> > to Andrew.
> >
> > =========================
> >
> > Use css_get/put instead of mem_cgroup_get/put.
> >
> > We can't do a simple replacement, because here mem_cgroup_put()
> > is called during mem_cgroup_css_free(), while mem_cgroup_css_free()
> > won't be called until css refcnt goes down to 0.
> >
> > Instead we increment css refcnt in mem_cgroup_css_offline(), and
> > then check if there's still kmem charges. If not, css refcnt will
> > be decremented immediately,
>
> > otherwise the refcnt won't be decremented when kmem charges goes down
> > to 0.
>
> This is a bit confusing. What about "otherwise the css refcount will be
> released after the last kmem allocation is uncharged."
>
> >
> > v3:
> > - changed wmb() to smp_smb(), and moved it to memcg_kmem_mark_dead(),
> > and added comment.
> >
> > v2:
> > - added wmb() in kmem_cgroup_css_offline(), pointed out by Michal
> > - revised comments as suggested by Michal
> > - fixed to check if kmem is activated in kmem_cgroup_css_offline()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 466c595..76dcd0e 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -416,6 +416,11 @@ static void memcg_kmem_clear_activated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >
> > static void memcg_kmem_mark_dead(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > {
> > + /*
> > + * We need to call css_get() first, because memcg_uncharge_kmem()
> > + * will call css_put() if it sees the memcg is dead.
> > + */
> > + smb_wmb();
> > if (test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags))
> > set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_DEAD, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
>
> I do not feel strongly about that but maybe open coding this in
> mem_cgroup_css_offline would be even better. There is only single caller
> and there is smaller chance somebody will use the function incorrectly
> later on.
>
> So I leave the decision on you because this doesn't matter much.
>
> [...]
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
