Hey, On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:48:01PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Ooh, right, we don't need cleanup of the cached cursors on destruction > > if we get this correct - especially if we make cursors point to the > > next cgroup to visit as self is always the first one to visit. > > You would need to pin the next-to-visit memcg as well, so you need a > cleanup on the removal. But that'd be one of the descendants of the said cgroup and there can no descendant left when the cgroup is being removed. What am I missing? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
