Re: [PATCH 3/3] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:39:49AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:20:23AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Michal.
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:30:23AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > We aren't talking about something gigantic or can
> > > 
> > > mem_cgroup is 888B now (depending on configuration). So I wouldn't call
> > > it negligible.
> > 
> > Do you think that the number can actually grow harmful?  Would you be
> > kind enough to share some calculations with me?
> 
> 5k cgroups * say 10 priority levels * 1k struct mem_cgroup may pin 51M
> of dead struct mem_cgroup, plus whatever else the css pins.

Bleh, ... * nr_node_ids * MAX_NR_ZONES.  So it is a couple hundred MB
in that case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux