> OK, let me summarize. The primary intention is to get rid of the current > soft reclaim infrastructure which basically bypasses the standard > reclaim and tight it directly into shrink_zone code. This also means > that the soft reclaim doesn't reclaim at priority 0 and that it is > active also for the targeted (aka limit) reclaim. > > Does this help? > Yes. What are the limitations of no-priority 0 reclaim? I'll also look at the patches Thanks, Balbir Singh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
