Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.11 1/3] cgroup: mark "tasks" cgroup file as insane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:13:02PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Some resources controlled by cgroup aren't per-task and cgroup core
> allowing threads of a single thread_group to be in different cgroups
> forced memcg do explicitly find the group leader and use it.  This is
> gonna be nasty when transitioning to unified hierarchy and in general
> we don't want and won't support granularity finer than processes.

With libvirt and KVM we require the ability to put different threads
in different cgroups for the "cpu", "cpuset" & "cpuacct" controllers.
This is to allow us to control schedular tunables / placement for
QEMU vCPU threads, independantly of limits for QEMU I/O threads. So
requiring all threads of a process to be in the same cgroup isn't
sufficiently flexible for our needs.

We don't care about this for the other non-CPU related controllers
though.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux