Re: [PATCH v7 07/34] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:39:08PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 12:07 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > +static long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> > +{
> > +	struct super_block *sb;
> > +	long	total_objects = 0;
> > +
> > +	sb = container_of(shrink, struct super_block, s_shrink);
> > +
> > +	if (!grab_super_passive(sb))
> > +		return -1;
> 
> Dave,
> 
> This is wrong, since mm/vmscan.c will WARN on count returning -1.
> Only scan can return -1, and this is probably a mistake while moving
> code over. Unless you shout, I am fixing this to "return 0" in this case.

That's why the WARN_ON() was put in shrink slab - to catch stuff
like this. ;)

So yes, it should return 0 here.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux