Re: [PATCH v5 04/31] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:06:21AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> With the dentry LRUs being per-sb structures, there is no real need
> for a global dentry_lru_lock. The locking can be made more
> fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU
> operations of different filesytsems completely from each other.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

Doesn't apply to a current linus tree. What is this patchset based
on?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux