On Tue 23-04-13 02:58:19, Michel Lespinasse wrote: [...] > However, your proposal takes that weak guarantee away as soon as one > tries to use cgroup hierarchies with it, because it reclaims from > every child cgroup as soon as the parent hits its soft limit. Reading this again I am really getting confused. The primary objection used to be that under-soft-limit inter-node subtree shouldn't be reclaimed although there are children over their soft limits. Now we have moved to over-limit inder-node shouldn't hammer its subtree? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
