Re: cpuset filesystems - a (short) doubt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013/4/2 22:17, David Shwatrz wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about cpuset filesystem - is it needed ?
> 
> In the cpuset example given in:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> we do not use the cpuset filesystsm but the cgroup filesystsm.
> (mount -t cgroup -ocpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset)
> 
> On my distro, which uses systemd + cgroups:
> mount | grep "type cpuset"
> gives nothing.
> 
> On the other hands, mount | grep "type cgroup" | wc -l
> gives: 9
> 
> I looked in the code of other subsystems (like blk cgroup and  memcg -
> memory control groups) and there is no filesystsm in the code; see
> block/blk-cgroup.c
> mm/memcontrol.c
> 
> so is the cpuset filesystsm really needed ?
> 

The cpuset filesystem is for backward compatibility.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux