On 2013/3/13 6:38, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >> Hi Tejun, >> >> If you're busy with other stuff, just take your time to go through those >> patches. >> >> 0001-cgroup-remove-cgroup_is_descentant.patch >> 0002-cgroup-remove-unused-variables-in-cgroup_destroy_loc.patch >> 0003-cgroup-hold-cgroup_mutex-before-calling-css_offline.patch >> 0004-cgroup-don-t-bother-to-resize-pid-array.patch >> 0005-cgroup-remove-useless-code-in-cgroup_write_event_con.patch >> 0006-cgroup-remove-unneeded-includes-from-cgroup.h.patch >> 0007-cgroup-fix-an-almost-harmless-off-by-one-bug.patch >> 0008-cgroup-consolidate-cgroup_attach_task-and-cgroup_att.patch > > 0001-0007 applied to cgroup/for-3.10. 0008 looks fine but in the diff > cgroup_attach_task_all() is removed completely and added back in > slightly different form. At first I thought cgroup_attach_task() was static, so I thought I had to either move cgroup_attach_task_all() after cgroup_attach_task(), or add a forward declaration of cgroup_attach_task() in order to pass compile. Then I found it was extern, but I forgot to revert this diff. Will send a v2. > If you wanna keep the functions ordered like > you posted, please put a separate patch to move > cgroup_attach_task_all() before the consolidation. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
