Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][ATTEND] Improving async io, specifically io_submit latencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:20:38AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> One obstacle there is we currently don't have a way to say "this
> workqueue belongs to this cgroup" as there is no "this" cgroup defined
> (awesome design).  That part is being rectified but for the time being
> we can probably say "this workqueue belongs to the same cgroups as
> %current" which should be enough for aio contexts, I think.

Or maybe we should just add current->wq which always matches cgroup
associations of the task?

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux