Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific memcg_lock fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2013/02/11 17:04), Glauber Costa wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm sorry I missed this...
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>   mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 28252c9..03ebf68 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5884,7 +5884,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>   	mutex_lock(&memcg_create_mutex);
>   	/* oom-kill-disable is a flag for subhierarchy. */
>   	if ((parent->use_hierarchy) || memcg_has_children(memcg)) {
> -		cgroup_unlock();
> +		mutex_unlock(&memcg_create_mutex);
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   	memcg->oom_kill_disable = val;
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux