Hey, On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:27:55PM +0400, Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand wrote: > > I would vote to -mm. Or is there any specific reason to have it in > > cgroup tree? It doesn't touch any cgroup core parts, does it? > > > Copying Andrew (retroactively sorry you weren't directly CCd on this one > as well). > > I depend on css_online and the cgroup generic iterator. If they are > already present @ -mm, then fine. > (looking now, they seem to be...) Yeah, they're all in cgroup/for-next so should be available in -mm, so I think -mm probably is the better tree to route these. Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
