Hi, On 01/10/2013 03:43 AM, Li Zefan wrote: > On 2013/1/9 23:03, Hans de Goede wrote: >> As indicated in the comment above cgroup_css_sets_empty the >> css_set_lock must be hold when calling it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> kernel/cgroup.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c >> index c908354..59e711a 100644 >> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c >> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c >> @@ -3980,7 +3980,10 @@ static int cgroup_rmdir(struct inode *unused_dir, struct dentry *dentry) >> /* the vfs holds both inode->i_mutex already */ >> again: >> mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex); >> - if (!cgroup_css_sets_empty(cgrp)) { >> + read_lock(&css_set_lock); >> + ret = cgroup_css_sets_empty(cgrp); > > This function doesn't exist in 3.4.xx kernel! It was introduced by an > out-of-tree patch, and that patch introduced these two bugs (maybe more). Ah, I didn't expect the sunxi support patches in linux-sunxi to touch the cgroup code, but since they also bring in a ton of android stuff they do, and you're right, this android specific patch is the culprit: https://github.com/linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi/commit/dbc38c633f4b7abe97c53036df55fbb2040188bc Sorry about the noise. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html