On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:19:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I want oppose it as well, but I believe part of this exercise is to make > the need to have hierarchy widespread. Warning on the case > 1st-level-only case helps with that, even if we make more noise than we > should. > > The reason I supported Tejun's proposal originally, is that I think that > if we make the wrong amount of noise, being wrong by a surplus is better > than being wrong by a deficit, in this case. I think both are valid points and don't think it makes a lot of difference either way. Michal being the maintainer of the code, I'm taking his approach for this one. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
