On 2012/8/17 7:20, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:12:16PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> We are able to safe some space when we assign the subsystem >> IDs at compile time. Instead of allocating per cgroup >> cgroup->subsys[CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT] where CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT is >> always 64, we allocate 12 + 1 at max (at this point there are 12 >> subsystem). > > So, IIUC, this is effectively removing the capability to implement > modularized controller which isn't known at kernel compile time. Am I > right? > I think so. > I don't think that's a bad idea but if we're doing that, can't we make > things even simpler? Do we need to distinguish in-kernel and module > at all? > > Li, what do you think about this? > I'm definitely all for simplicity, but I'm not sure if we can do better in simplifying the code for modularized cgroup subsystem. (I guess you didn't mean to remove this feature?) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
