Hello, Eric. On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:50AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > - Create a new mount namespace. > - Create fresh mounts of all of the control groups like I would do at > boot, with no consideration to any other control group state. > - Start forking processes. > > The expected semantics would be something like chroot for control > groups, where all of the control groups that are created by fresh mounts > are relative to whatever state the process of being in a control group > that the process that mounted them was in. No, any attempt to build namespace support into cgroup core code will be nacked with strong prejudice. I still think it was a mistake to add that to sysfs. Thankfully, procfs is going the FUSE way and I hope in time we could convert sysfs to a similar mechanism and deprecate the in-kernel support. So, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. :P -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html