Re: [Devel] Re: containers and cgroups mini-summit @ Linux Plumbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Eric.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:50AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> - Create a new mount namespace.
> - Create fresh mounts of all of the control groups like I would do at
>   boot, with no consideration to any other control group state.
> - Start forking processes.
> 
> The expected semantics would be something like chroot for control
> groups, where all of the control groups that are created by fresh mounts
> are relative to whatever state the process of being in a control group
> that the process that mounted them was in.

No, any attempt to build namespace support into cgroup core code will
be nacked with strong prejudice.  I still think it was a mistake to
add that to sysfs.  Thankfully, procfs is going the FUSE way and I
hope in time we could convert sysfs to a similar mechanism and
deprecate the in-kernel support.

So, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. :P

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux