Re: + hugetlb-cgroup-simplify-pre_destroy-callback.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 19-07-12 17:51:05, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > From 621ed1c9dab63bd82205bd5266eb9974f86a0a3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:23:23 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: keep cgroup_mutex locked for pre_destroy
> >
> > 3fa59dfb (cgroup: fix potential deadlock in pre_destroy) dropped the
> > cgroup_mutex lock while calling pre_destroy callbacks because memory
> > controller could deadlock because force_empty triggered reclaim.
> > Since "memcg: move charges to root cgroup if use_hierarchy=0" there is
> > no reclaim going on from mem_cgroup_force_empty though so we can safely
> > keep the cgroup_mutex locked. This has an advantage that no tasks might
> > be added during pre_destroy callback and so the handlers don't have to
> > consider races when new tasks add new charges. This simplifies the
> > implementation.
> > ---
> >  kernel/cgroup.c |    2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> > index 0f3527d..9dba05d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> > @@ -4181,7 +4181,6 @@ again:
> >  		mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  	}
> > -	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> >
> >  	/*
> >  	 * In general, subsystem has no css->refcnt after pre_destroy(). But
> > @@ -4204,7 +4203,6 @@ again:
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> >  	parent = cgrp->parent;
> >  	if (atomic_read(&cgrp->count) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children)) {
> >  		clear_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
> 
> mem_cgroup_force_empty still calls 
> 
> lru_add_drain_all 
>    ->schedule_on_each_cpu
>         -> get_online_cpus
>            ->mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> 
> So wont we deadlock ?

Yes you are right. I got it wrong. I thought that the reclaim is the
main problem. It won't be that easy then and the origin mm patch
(hugetlb-cgroup-simplify-pre_destroy-callback.patch) still needs a fix
or to be dropped.

> 
> -aneesh

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux