Re: [PATCH] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 16:11 +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> 
> Should the warning be emitted for any memcg, not just the parent?  If
> somebody takes notice of the changed semantics, it's better to print
> the warning on the first try to disable hierarchies instead of holding
> back until they walk up the tree and try to change it in the root.
> Still forbid disabling at lower levels, just be more eager to inform
> the people trying it. 

*blink* You mean you can mix-and-match use_hierarchy over the hierarchy?
Can I have some of those drugs? It must be strong and powerful stuff
that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux