(2012/06/25 18:33), Michal Hocko wrote:
Marking this patch as memcg is quite misleading. mm is more suitable.
On Mon 25-06-12 16:43:32, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Since LRU_ALL_EVICTABLE is useless, just remove it.
It's really strange but I do not see any usage of this except for it's
introduction. So agreed to remove it.
Add LRU_ALL_UNEVICTABLE to mask unevictable pages.
Does it really make sense to introduce just for two uses in a single
function?
I don't think so.
I doubt LRU_ALL_UNEVICTABLE implies there are other UNEVICTABLE LRUS
other than LRU_UNEVICTABLE.
For example, LRU_ALL_UNEVICTABLE means
if total_swap==0, UNEVICTABLE+ANON
if total_swap!=0, UNEVICTABLE,
This will have its own meanings...but I don't see there are any users.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
