Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add a __GFP_SLABMEMCG flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/08/2012 11:31 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Please make this conditional on CONFIG_MEMCG or so. The bit can be useful
in particular on 32 bit architectures.
Looking at how __GFP_NOTRACK works - which is also ifdef'd, the bit it uses is skipped if that is not defined, which I believe is a sane thing to do.

Given that, I don't see the point of conditionally defining the memcg bit, It basically means that the only way we can reuse the bit saved is by making a future feature fundamentally incompatible with memcg.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux