On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > This will allow us to call destroy() without holding the > cgroup_mutex(). Other important updates inside update_flags() > are protected by the callback_mutex. > > We could protect this variable with the callback_mutex as well, > as suggested by Li Zefan, but we need to make sure we are protected > by that mutex at all times, and some of its updates happen inside the > cgroup_mutex - which means we would deadlock. Would this not also be a good case to introduce static branching? number_of_cpusets is used to avoid going through unnecessary processing should there be no cpusets in use. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
