On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:53:44 +0400 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should use the acessor res_counter_read_u64 for that. > Although a purely cosmetic change is sometimes better of delayed, > to avoid conflicting with other people's work, we are starting to > have people touching this code as well, and reproducing the open > code behavior because that's the standard =) > > ... > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -3708,7 +3708,7 @@ move_account: > goto try_to_free; > cond_resched(); > /* "ret" should also be checked to ensure all lists are empty. */ > - } while (memcg->res.usage > 0 || ret); > + } while (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) > 0 || ret); > out: > css_put(&memcg->css); > return ret; > @@ -3723,7 +3723,7 @@ try_to_free: > lru_add_drain_all(); > /* try to free all pages in this cgroup */ > shrink = 1; > - while (nr_retries && memcg->res.usage > 0) { > + while (nr_retries && res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) > 0) { > int progress; > > if (signal_pending(current)) { Actually this fixes bugs on 32-bit machines. Good luck trying to demonstrate them at runtime though ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html