Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:44:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 15:39 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > If we can get to the point where nesting is fully
> > supported by every controller first, that would be awesome too. 
> 
> As long as that is the goal.. otherwise, I'd be overjoyed if I can rip
> nesting support out of the cpu-controller.. that stuff is such a pain.
> Then again, I don't think the container people like this proposal --
> they were the ones pushing for full hierarchy back when.

Yeah, the great pain of full hierarchy support is one of the reasons
why I keep thinking about supporting mapping to flat hierarchy.  Full
hierarchy could be too painful and not useful enough for some
controllers.  Then again, cpu and memcg already have it and according
to Vivek blkcg also had a proposed implementation, so maybe it's okay.
Let's see.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux