Re: [PATCH 04/10] memcg: Introduce __GFP_NOACCOUNT.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 01:38 PM, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
>> Another possible example might be the skb data, which are just kmalloc
>> and are already accounted by your TCP accounting changes, so we might
>> not want to account them a second time.
>
>
> How so?
>
> struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>                            int fclone, int node)
> {
>        [ ... ]
>        cache = fclone ? skbuff_fclone_cache : skbuff_head_cache;
>
>        /* Get the HEAD */
>        skb = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cache, gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DMA, node);

Just a few lines below:

        data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size, gfp_mask, node);

-- Suleiman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux