On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:41 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > If your complete control is % based then I would assume its a % of a %. > Simple enough. > > If its bandwidth based then simply don't allow a child to consume more > bandwidth than its parent, also simple. > > If your layman isn't capable of grokking that, he should stay the f*ck > away from it. Fact is, the scheduler does both these things, so there's absolutely no reason for other controllers not to do so too. Its the only sensible thing if you want hierarchy. My utter disregard for cgroups comes from having to actually implement a controller for them, its a frigging nightmare. The systemd retards mandating all this nonsense for booting a machine is completely bonghit inspired and hasn't made me feel any better about it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
