Re: [PATCH 4/7] chained slab caches: move pages to a different cache when a cache is destroyed.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the context of tracking kernel memory objects to a cgroup, the
> following problem appears: we may need to destroy a cgroup, but
> this does not guarantee that all objects inside the cache are dead.
> This can't be guaranteed even if we shrink the cache beforehand.
>
> The simple option is to simply leave the cache around. However,
> intensive workloads may have generated a lot of objects and thus
> the dead cache will live in memory for a long while.

Why is this a problem?

Leaving the cache around while there are still active objects in it
would certainly be a lot simpler to understand and implement.

-- Suleiman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux