Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:22:59PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >>> Do not mix genuine bug fixes and cleanups.
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise I cannot apply your bug fixes to the 'net' tree.
> >>>
> >>> Seperate things out, submit only pure bug fixes first, then
> >>> later once those changes propagate you can submit the cleanups.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I did seperate them out, so the first three patches are fixes,
> >> and others are cleanups. I can resend cleanup patches once
> >> fixes hit mainline.
> > 
> > Seperate them in different groups, don't submit them as one
> > collection.  And definitely don't submit them all at the
> > same damn time!  You have to wait with the dependent cleanups
> > until the fixes go in, and subsequently show up in my net-next
> > tree.
> > 
> > I'm not applying this stuff until you submit it properly, in
> > two stages.
> > 
> 
> I'll do this when I get some comments/acks.
> 

The changes look fine to me.
I'll ack them once you submit them properly.
Thanks
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux