On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:57:16PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > There is a case in __sk_mem_schedule(), where an allocation > is beyond the maximum, but yet we are allowed to proceed. > It happens under the following condition: > > sk->sk_wmem_queued + size >= sk->sk_sndbuf > > The network code won't revert the allocation in this case, > meaning that at some point later it'll try to do it. Since > this is never communicated to the underlying res_counter > code, there is an inbalance in res_counter uncharge operation. > > I see two ways of fixing this: > > 1) storing the information about those allocations somewhere > in memcg, and then deducting from that first, before > we start draining the res_counter, > 2) providing a slightly different allocation function for > the res_counter, that matches the original behavior of > the network code more closely. > > I decided to go for #2 here, believing it to be more elegant, > since #1 would require us to do basically that, but in a more > obscure way. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> > CC: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Laurent Chavey <chavey@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
