Hello, On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:27:18PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > Furthermore, I noticed tmpfs also implemented xattr support, and we > should be able to share most of the code, which makes the cost for > having this feature smaller. Yes, maybe, but tmpfs doesn't have any special semantics attached to files. It's supposed to store opaque data from userland. Regardless of code complexity, I just don't think this is a good idea. What if we later want to attach certain config meaning to or export statistics via xattrs? That would be quite unusual and require strong rationale but at least fall in the similar usage as with the rest of the fs. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
