On 12/14/2011 10:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:09:14AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
That's indeed confusing, and it comes from the fact that we always
inherit clone_children from the parent - which is sane, IMHO. So
this flag only has any value in establishing the initial behaviour
of the top root cgroup. I wonder then if it wouldn't better to just
be explicit and fail in this case ?
I don't think all current behaviors are sane and if not let's change
them, but those things have to be explicit with proper description and
rationale.
140 % agree to that. As I said, I wrongly believed it to be functionally
equivalent when I sent it, but missed the flags remount check.
If you believe the behavior we now get is saner, I can rewrite the
Changelog and resend it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
