On 12/13/2011 05:59 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 13 décembre 2011 à 14:49 +0100, Christoph Paasch a écrit :
now there are plenty of compiler-warnings when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set:
In file included from include/linux/tcp.h:211:0,
from include/linux/ipv6.h:221,
from include/net/ip_vs.h:23,
from kernel/sysctl_binary.c:6:
include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: ‘struct cgroup_subsys’ declared
inside parameter list [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: its scope is only this definition or
declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: ‘struct cgroup’ declared inside
parameter list [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:68:61: warning: ‘struct cgroup_subsys’ declared
inside parameter list [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:68:61: warning: ‘struct cgroup’ declared inside
parameter list [enabled by default]
Because struct cgroup is only declared if CONFIG_CGROUPS is enabled.
(cfr. linux/cgroup.h)
Yes, we probably need forward reference like this :
Thanks !
[PATCH net-next] net: fix build error if CONFIG_CGROUPS=n
Reported-by: Christoph Paasch<christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
I am deeply sorry about that.
I was pretty sure I tested this case. But now that I looked into it, it
occurs to me that I may have tested it only with the Memory Cgroup
disabled, not with the master flag off.
Thanks for spotting this
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
