On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:33:24 -0200 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We already have a pointer to the cgroup parent (whose data is more likely > to be in the cache than this, anyway), so there is no need to have this one > in cpuacct. > > This patch makes the underlying cgroup be used instead. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Paul Tuner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> makes sense Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
