On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:59:13 -0200 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > This is an excerpt of the last patches I sent regarding cpu cgroup. > It is mostly focused on cleaning up what we have now, so it can > be considered largely preparation. As a user of the new organization > of things, I am including cpuacct stats functionality in the end of > the series. The files related to cpuusage are left to be sent in > an upcoming series after this one is included. > > Let me know if there is anything you'd like me to address. > I'm sorry but let me several questions. Why cpu cgroup but cpuacct cgroup ? If scheduler stat is reported via cpu cgroup, it makes sense. If user accounting information is reported via cpu cgroup, I feel it's strange. Do you want to make cpuacct cgroup obsolete and merge 2 cgroups ? What's relationship between this new counters and cpuacct cgroup ? Aren't users confused ? Please provide Documenation. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
