very interesting LFX insights! 2 takeaways on PRs: * gigantic PRs (+500 LoC) review process is probably less effective. less time is spent on reviewing them, and they have less review comments than large (100-499 LoC) PRs this is sad, but also makes sense as people are reluctant to commit to such large and time consuming reviews. * the lifetime of our PRs looks ineffective: * it takes more time for the review to start than the actual review process - this seems like a communication problem between the contributors creating the PRs and the contributors doing the review * and it takes much much longer to merge them once the PR is approved - this is probably due to the test process (which is a known issue...) On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:33 PM Afreen Misbah <afrahman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Here are the meeting minutes from the 2025-02-24 call. > > Joseph shared LFX insights on ceph! > > - > > Link to the insights > <https://insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/foundation/cephfoundation/overview/github?project=cephfoundation&routedFrom=Github&bestPractice=false> > > QE updates (Yuri) > > - > > 6 outstanding PRs > <https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3Av18.2.5> > - > > Eric is going to take a look at them and provide inputs > - > > can start release process as soon as the PRs merge > > Release scheduling (Greg) > > Discussions from ongoing mail thread Ceph Tentacle release timeline — > when? > <https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@xxxxxxx/thread/PNJB3CW43NFL2VTCFVZDIUKKGLKZMVJF/#ZM3MWUGFPR6LLZJ27PA3R54LHIF3VHXK> > > - > > People want fast EC > - > > EC work in upstream making progress > - > > Move the technical discussions to mailing list > - > > distro sync is important for a lot of operators due to tooling > available-by-default, even if using Ceph upstream packages > - > > containers vs packages: Packages are stable enough > - > > tentacle when fast EC ready, and freeze "U" in January for an April > release next year? > - > > Do we need/want to extend our major-version upgrade commitments for > the shorter time frames? > - > > Ceph does not give release for an entire year > - > > Need to prepare a plan and see what resources and costs will be > needed > - > > Better to go for stability rather than quickness > > Tentacle Kickoff PR (Patrick) > > - > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61321 > - > > QA: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70000 > - > > Merge soon to avoid rebases > > > Ceph build PR (Patrick) > > - > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-build/pull/2315 > - > > Blocked on Dan Mick ,probably take a look soon > > > Ceph Labs presentation (David) > > - > > During Ceph Infra call 2/27 12:30 Eastern > - > > Feel free to join > > > -- > > Afreen > > > -- > > Afreen > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |