Thanks for the feedback! Yes, the Heath_ok is there.] The OSD status show all of them as "exists,up". The interesting part is that "ceph df" shows the correct values in the "RAW STORAGE" section. However, for the SSD pool I have, it shows only the previous value as the max usable value. I had 384 TiB as the RAW space before. The SSD pool is a replicated pool with replica as 3. Therefore, I had about 128TiB as possible usable space for the pool before. Now that I added a new node, I would expect 480 RAW space, which is what I have in the RAW STORAGE section, but the usable space to be used in the pool has not changed. I would expect the usable space to grow at about 160TiB. I know that these limits will never be reached as we have locks in 85%-90% for each OSD. On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:41 AM Marc <Marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I still think they are not part of the cluster somehow. "ceph osd status" > shows most likely they are not used. When you add just 1 osd you should see > something in your cluster capacity and some rebalancing. Status of ceph is > HEALTH_OK? > > > > Thanks for the prompt reply. > > > > Yes, it does. All of them are up, with the correct class that is used by > > the crush algorithm. > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 7:47 AM Marc <Marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:Marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello guys, > > > Let's say I have a cluster with 4 nodes with 24 SSDs each, and a > > single > > > pool that consumes all OSDs of all nodes. After adding another > > host, I > > > noticed that no extra space was added. Can this be a result of > > the > > > number > > > of PGs I am using? > > > > > > I mean, when adding more hosts/OSDs, should I always consider > > increasing > > > the number of PGs from a pool? > > > > > > > ceph osd tree > > > > shows all up and with correct weight? > > > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |