Re: CephFS subdatapool in practice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 5:20 PM Otto Richter (Codeberg e.V.)
<otto@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Any caveats to be aware of, such as overhead, latency, long-term
> maintainability?
>
>
> Since certain "interesting" features have been deprecated in the past, such as
> inline_data, I thought it would be better to ask here for feedback first.

The multiple-pools feature should exist forever. It's not complicated,
brings a lot of utility, and is well tested and well-integrated with
the rest of the system. :)
None of that was true for inline data or cache tiering (which are the
notable deprecated features I can recall offhand).
-Greg
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux