Re: Spec file: Possible typo in example:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now that I’m not on my phone …

Note the URL that you supplied:  it specifies the documentation branch for the Octopus release, which is now EOL.  This can happen especially when following search engine results for a query.  This highlights the value in ensuring that one gets the appropriate docs for the release in question.   For recent releases you can usually edit the URL in-situ.  In this case the file topology changed.  The Pacific release restructured this section and this content is now found under cephadm/services/osd:


https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/6c97777c921609acd26242f99a1c9dbbcd667f3e/doc/cephadm/services/osd.rst?plain=1#L762;
ceph/doc/cephadm/services/osd.rst at 6c97777c921609acd26242f99a1c9dbbcd667f3e · ceph/ceph
github.com

Following the git branches through Quincy then Reef I see

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/reef/doc/cephadm/services/osd.rst#L818;
Blaming ceph/doc/cephadm/services/osd.rst at reef · ceph/ceph
github.com


that this was caught and fixed ~ 3 years ago.


> On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:27 PM, Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Nice catch.  I’ll get a fix in.
> 
>> On Feb 4, 2025, at 2:10 PM, Alan Murrell <Alan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I am not sure if this is the right list to put this, but I was just looking over the documentation for the Service Spec file:
>> 
>> https://docs.ceph.com/en/octopus/cephadm/drivegroups/
>> 
>> and under one of the "Advanced Cases" example, I believe there *might* be an error?  Here is the example (for 20 HDDs, 12 SSDs, 2 NVMEs):
>> 
>> --- START ---
>> service_type: osd
>> service_id: osd_spec_hdd
>> placement:
>> host_pattern: '*'
>> data_devices:
>> rotational: 0
>> db_devices:
>> model: MC-55-44-XZ
>> limit: 2 (db_slots is actually to be favoured here, but it's not implemented yet)
>> ---
>> service_type: osd
>> service_id: osd_spec_ssd
>> placement:
>> host_pattern: '*'
>> data_devices:
>> model: MC-55-44-XZ
>> db_devices:
>> vendor: VendorC
>> --- END ---
>> 
>> For the 'data_devices' under the 'osd_spec_hdd' layout, should 'rotational' not be '1' instead of '0'?  The earlier "Simple" example (20 HDDs, 2 SSDs) has 'rotational' as '1'.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux