On 18/12/24 02:30, Janek Bevendorff wrote: > I did increase the pgp_num of a pool a while back, totally > forgot about that. Due to the ongoing rebalancing it was stuck half way, > but now suddenly started up again. The current PG number of that pool is > not quite final yet, but definitely higher than previously. If you want this to stabilise faster, you could set pg_num (target) to be the value that it is right now. You'll get POOL_PG_NUM_NOT_POWER_OF_TWO warning but you can ignore or mute that for a time. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |