> > To be honest with 3:8 we could protect the cluster more from osd flapping. > > Let's say you have less chance to have 8 down pgs on 8 separate nodes then with 8:3 only 3pgs on 3 nodes. > > Of course this comes with the cost on storage used. > > Is there any disadvantage performance wise on this? > > A few years back someone asserted that EC values with small prime factors are advantageous, so 23,11 would be doubleplus ungood. I thought it was that K should preferably be a power of two, M as many as your security demands require. Also pools should have power-of-two PGs, and bucket shards would be primes. I could be wrong though. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |