Re: Please discuss about Slow Peering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We used the "kioxia kcd6xvul3t20" model.
Any infamous information of this Model?

2024년 5월 17일 (금) 오전 2:58, Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@xxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:

> If using jumbo frames, also ensure that they're consistently enabled on
> all OS instances and network devices.
>
> > On May 16, 2024, at 09:30, Frank Schilder <frans@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is a long shot: if you are using octopus, you might be hit by this
> pglog-dup problem:
> https://docs.clyso.com/blog/osds-with-unlimited-ram-growth/. They don't
> mention slow peering explicitly in the blog, but its also a consequence
> because the up+acting OSDs need to go through the PG_log during peering.
> >
> > We are also using octopus and I'm not sure if we have ever seen slow ops
> caused by peering alone. It usually happens when a disk cannot handle load
> under peering. We have, unfortunately, disks that show random latency
> spikes (firmware update pending). You can try to monitor OPS latencies for
> your drives when peering and look for something that sticks out. People on
> this list were reporting quite bad results for certain infamous NVMe
> brands. If you state your model numbers, someone else might recognize it.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > =================
> > Frank Schilder
> > AIT Risø Campus
> > Bygning 109, rum S14
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: 서민우 <smw940219@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 7:39 AM
> > To: ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > Subject:  Please discuss about Slow Peering
> >
> > Env:
> > - OS: Ubuntu 20.04
> > - Ceph Version: Octopus 15.0.0.1
> > - OSD Disk: 2.9TB NVMe
> > - BlockStorage (Replication 3)
> >
> > Symptom:
> > - Peering when OSD's node up is very slow. Peering speed varies from PG
> to
> > PG, and some PG may even take 10 seconds. But, there is no log for 10
> > seconds.
> > - I checked the effect of client VM's. Actually, Slow queries of mysql
> > occur at the same time.
> >
> > There are Ceph OSD logs of both Best and Worst.
> >
> > Best Peering Case (0.5 Seconds)
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:44.693+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27368
> pg[6.8]
> > state<Start>: transitioning to Primary
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:45.165+0900 7f108f52a700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27371
> pg[6.8]
> > state<Started/Primary/Peering>: Peering, affected_by_map, going to Reset
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:45.165+0900 7f108f52a700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27371
> pg[6.8]
> > start_peering_interval up [7,6,11] -> [6,11], acting [7,6,11] -> [6,11],
> > acting_primary 7 -> 6, up_primary 7 -> 6, role 0 -> -1, features acting
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:45.165+0900 7f108f52a700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27377
> pg[6.8]
> > state<Start>: transitioning to Primary
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:45.165+0900 7f108f52a700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27377
> pg[6.8]
> > start_peering_interval up [6,11] -> [7,6,11], acting [6,11] -> [7,6,11],
> > acting_primary 6 -> 7, up_primary 6 -> 7, role -1 -> 0, features acting
> >
> > Worst Peering Case (11.6 Seconds)
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:45.169+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27377
> pg[30.20]
> > state<Start>: transitioning to Stray
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:45.169+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27377
> pg[30.20]
> > start_peering_interval up [0,1] -> [0,7,1], acting [0,1] -> [0,7,1],
> > acting_primary 0 -> 0, up_primary 0 -> 0, role -1 -> 1, features acting
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:46.173+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27378
> pg[30.20]
> > state<Start>: transitioning to Stray
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:46.173+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27378
> pg[30.20]
> > start_peering_interval up [0,7,1] -> [0,7,1], acting [0,7,1] -> [0,1],
> > acting_primary 0 -> 0, up_primary 0 -> 0, role 1 -> -1, features acting
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:57.794+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27390
> pg[30.20]
> > state<Start>: transitioning to Stray
> > 2024-04-11T15:32:57.794+0900 7f108b522700  1 osd.7 pg_epoch: 27390
> pg[30.20]
> > start_peering_interval up [0,7,1] -> [0,7,1], acting [0,1] -> [0,7,1],
> > acting_primary 0 -> 0, up_primary 0 -> 0, role -1 -> 1, features acting
> >
> > *I wish to know about*
> > - Why some PG's take 10 seconds until Peering finishes.
> > - Why Ceph log is quiet during peering.
> > - Is this symptom intended in Ceph.
> >
> > *And please give some advice,*
> > - Is there any way to improve peering speed?
> > - Or, Is there a way to not affect the client when peering occurs?
> >
> > P.S
> > - I checked the symptoms in the following environments.
> > -> Octopus Version, Reef Version, Cephadm, Ceph-Ansible
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux