Re: PGs with status active+clean+laggy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: PGs with status active+clean+laggy
From: mori.ricardo@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:24:06 -0000
In-reply-to: <56ab7f40-c774-4e98-9fbc-232e32244dd6@heinlein-support.de>
References: <56ab7f40-c774-4e98-9fbc-232e32244dd6@heinlein-support.de>
User-agent: HyperKitty on http://lists.ceph.io/

I expressed myself wrong. I only have SSDs in my cluster. I meant that in 2 of 3 nodes I have nvme in another pool.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

References:
- Re: PGs with status active+clean+laggy
  - From: Robert Sander

Prev by Date: Re: Slow RGW multisite sync due to "304 Not Modified" responses on primary zone
Next by Date: PGs with status active+clean+laggy
Previous by thread: Re: PGs with status active+clean+laggy
Next by thread: PGs with status active+clean+laggy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux