On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:23 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Update. > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Adam King (see Laura's comments below) > rgw - Casey approved > fs - Venky approved > rbd - Ilya No issues in RBD, formal approval is pending on [1] which also spills into RADOS (same job, I believe). > krbd - Ilya Approved. > > upgrade/nautilus-x (pacific) - fixed by Casey > upgrade/octopus-x (pacific) - Adam King is looking > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64279 > > upgrade/pacific-x (quincy) - blocked by > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64256 (Laura, Dan, Adam pls take a > look) > > upgrade/pacific-p2p - Ilya PTL (maybe rbd related?) I can answer only for test_librbd_python.sh failures -- 3 out of 5 jobs there. They popped up because these jobs are running tests from 16.2.7 against librbd from pacific-release (i.e. almost 16.2.15). One of the tests happened to pass an incorrect argument and was adjusted together with the fix for the bug in question [2]. A different variation of this came up in [3] earlier. I don't think there is any way to fix this other than to disable test_rbd.TestImage.test_diff_iterate test in upgrades. We can't account for such version mismatches when writing tests. [1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64126 [2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63846 [3] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63941 Thanks, Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |